<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Seth Keen &#187; archives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sethkeen.net/blog/tag/archives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sethkeen.net/blog</link>
	<description>non video new video net video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:08:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>dead but not buried</title>
		<link>http://www.sethkeen.net/blog/2007/03/13/dead-but-not-buried/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sethkeen.net/blog/2007/03/13/dead-but-not-buried/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seth.keen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[videodefunct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sethkeen.net/blog/2007/03/13/dead-but-not-buried/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.sethkeen.net/blog/2007/03/13/dead-but-not-buried/' addthis:title='dead but not buried '><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&#38;username=xa-4d2b47f81ddfbdce" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a></div>In the last few weeks I have been planning out an approach towards the videodefunct video database project. Initally, I imagined developing one-off video objects that provided a critique of the video-sharing site YouTube. The idea was to explore in each of these objects, both a formal and cultural critique. This means the works would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://www.sethkeen.net/blog/2007/03/13/dead-but-not-buried/' addthis:title='dead but not buried '><a href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;username=xa-4d2b47f81ddfbdce" class="addthis_button_compact">Share</a></div><p>In the last few weeks I have been planning out an approach towards the <a href="http://www.sethkeen.net/blog/videodefunct/"><em>videodefunct </em></a>video database project. Initally, I imagined developing one-off video objects that provided a critique of the video-sharing site YouTube. The idea was to explore in each of these objects, both a formal and cultural critique. This means the works would aim to experiment both with form and content as part of examining video as a form beyond single-channel closed objects, like the hardcopy output approach of television programs, or even a cinematic edit going to a locked-off film print. A video form that as dicussed in the post on <a href="http://www.sethkeen.net/blog/2007/03/02/podcasting-video-to-ipods/">ipod video</a>, is more responsive to the properties of the Internet as a network. Then a <strong>light bulb</strong> went off in regards to a blog as a form of a video database. Instead of placing the emphasis on a single video object, what happens if each uploaded video is seen as being a part of a larger whole, the database? The focus shifts to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxonomy">taxomony </a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy">folksonomy</a>. In the short term an initial experiment using the customised version of WordPress being developed in the <em>videodefunct </em>project may be about exploring each individual video as part of a larger collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sethkeen.net/blog/2007/03/13/dead-but-not-buried/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.230 seconds -->

