Archive for the 'narrative, folksonomy' Category

dialable

dialable | everything you need is already in your pocket.

Dialable is a suite of technologies which allows the public to control big-screen content with simple cellphone interaction. Growing out of thesis work at NYU’s Interactive Telecommunications Program, it is a project by Daniel Liss.

Archive references

Today, I had a moment to read the introductory essay ‘Archive Fever: Photography Between History and the Monument’, by Okwui Enwezor in the book Okwui Enwezor, ‘Archive Fever, Uses of the Document in Contemporary Art’, International Center of Photography:New York, Steidl: Gottingen, 2008.

The aim is not to produce a theory of the archive but to show ways in which the archival documents, information gathering and data-driven analysis, the contradictions of master narratives, the inventions of counter archives and thus counter-narratives, the projection of the social imagination into sites of testimony, witnessing, and more inform the practices of contemporary art. p. 22

…as part of the a broad culture of sampling, sharing, and recombining of visual data in infinite calibrations of users and receivers. We are fundamentally concerned with the overlay of the iconographic, taxonomic, indexical, typological, and archaeological means by which artists generate new historical as well as analytical readings of the archive. p. 23

Some of the references I noted in this essay:

Books
Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse of Language, New York: Pantheon Books, 1972.
W.J.T Mitchell, What do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

MIT Press Journals
Hal Foster, An Archival Impulse, October, Fall 2004, Vol. -, No. , Pages 3-22
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/0162287042379847

Glasshouse Birdman

The Glasshouse Birdman prototype is coming together as a work-in-progress. It has been a useful experience to learn how this type of production is recorded, authored and structured.

Montage editing: In comparsion to the usual broadcast production there seems to be little need to use montage editing. In most cases the granular nature of videodefunct works with scenes as short duration single continuous shots. Even dialogue with the style of approach suits being uncut. I was surprised that this would be the case in a documentary style prototype. It is amazing how much conversation and observation is presented in small self-contained fragments. In fact montage editing seems strange in this environment not only from a production perspective but also as clips. The multi-channel composition asks for scenes to be realised as shots played back concurrently rather than edited into montage sequences. The breaking up of time in a montage sequence seems very odd after working with single continuous shots. Although, I think sharp short montage sequences could be used to enhance single continuous shots in the triptych. Also, longer edited montage sequences, I found due to edits and change in shots information ended up being big file sizes with compression. I

Recording notes: I did find myself shooting with the zoom and handheld camera moves I would not normally use to get coverage as part of aiming for one continuous shot. Working solo I experimented with a radio mic because I knew this work would rely on Terry telling stories as he did things. Also, I had to dress in Terry’s clothing as the birds freaked out when I was around on the first day, so a audio person would have made things even harder. In retrospect, the radio mic sound brought up ideas about online video audio where in comparison to television and cinema the subtleties and complexities within reason are not so important or even lost through most computer speakers. The radio microphone recorded the audio close to the Terry including his dialogue and sound associated with his actions. These sounds in miniature video frames are what is needed to make things clear for the viewer, the sounds that help communicate what is happening on screen. But, I did have some technical problems with the radio mic on movement which could be refined. Also, more time could be put into mixing in atmospheric underlay to make things richer and make up for all the audio being recorded close and narrow through the radio mic. Post-production processes do need to be simple though when you are working with so many singular clips.

In the hypertext environment where the clips are highly granular, self-contained and inter-linked, a lot of the content can be used, with all sorts of supporting narrative threads. I even considered a behind the scenes category for example. There is real opportunity to be self-reflexive and work very informally compared to the restrictions of a single montage edit in terms of camera coverage, the narrative structure and what has to be discarded. In this example it is really surprising the ratio of content that is usable. A highly sustainable way of recording.

Categories and Tags: I am starting to make narrative structures work using categories and tags in hierarchical levels. The user enters categories then brings up tags. The narrative can be contained within a category by keeping the tag only within that category with no cross-references which leads to a type of dead-end for the user. Introducing some tags that cross-over into other categories utlises the hypertextual nature of the interface and makes the multi-channel viewing more dynamic. The trick seems to be to keep tags to a minimum and make the cross-over choices with some consideration. I did find myself re-thinking categories as I got to know the material better.

Interface design: There could be some changes to the way the interface is modified for this content. For example I like the three audio tracks running with the louder being moused over. But with the single person focus there is no real need to hear three lots of dialogue across the triptych - the volume could be lowered on the clips not being watched. More later on other revisions with the categories and tags.

birdman portrait

I put this summary together for a in-house post-grad feedback session next week. The portrait angle helps with clarifying my objectives with the prototype.

Birdman Portrait: I am in the process of making a Videodefunct (VD) prototype that explores the structuring of an online video portrait. I am interested in making a prototype that reflects more of a traditional documentary approach compared to the earlier abstract VD prototype ‘Pedestrian’. The content is personal and intimate with the objective to produce an example that is accessible to a broader audience. The portrait is of a wildlife carer named Terry Dale who specialises in looking after native birds in Queensland. We recorded together his daily routine of caring for native birds, which included in a very informal manner the documentation of numerous stories of his experiences. What I am looking for in terms of feedback on a micro-level is ideas on how the material should be archived, with the objective of using this example to clarify the broader objectives of my doctorate research. The structuring of this content is affected by decisions that incorporate not only narrative but also classfication and interaction design.

birdman_portrait_2.jpg

korsakow

I did some research on this korsakow application awhile back and wanted to note the link. There is certain flexibility like creating rule scenes. From the abput page:

They are interactive - the viewer has influence on the film. They are rule-based - the author decides on the rules scenes relate to each other, he does not create a fixed order. They are generative - the order of the scenes is calculated while the viewer looks at a Korsakow-project. Korsakow-projects can only be viewed on a computer. They are delivered via internet-streaming, DVD-Rom or CD-Rom.

participatory video

wikipedia participatory video definition:

Participatory Video (PV) is a set of techniques to involve a group or community in shaping and creating their own film. The idea behind this is that making a video is easy and accessible, and is a great way of bringing people together to explore issues, voice concerns or simply to be creative and tell stories. It is therefore primarily about process, though high quality and accessible films (products) can be created using these methods if that is a desired outcome. This process can be very empowering, enabling a group or community to take their own action to solve their own problems, and also to communicate their needs and ideas to decision-makers and/or other groups and communities. As such, PV can be a highly effective tool to engage and mobilise marginalised people, and to help them to implement their own forms of sustainable development based on local needs.

tagging differences

I have been looking around at tagging and noticed that the ABC online use a specific style of tagging. An example ‘government-and-politics’. They sometimes use 2-3-4 word tags. This style of tagging seems to be referred to as a multi-word tag on the microformats wiki, which are done in varying ways and supported by different social media websites.

Examples of variations (world-politics world_politics world+politics world.politics WorldPolitics) delicious as far as I can tell supports all of these combinations, what microformats calls combined tags (from delicious):

The only limitation on tags is that they must not include spaces. So if your web page is about a two-word place like “San Francisco”, you may want to tag it as sf, san-francisco, SanFrancisco, san.francisco, or whatever else makes sense to you. You probably don’t want to use commas, though, since a comma will be become part of the tag.

On the videoblogging mail list David Meade in the post ‘[videoblogging] tagging posts in wordpress question’ notices some issues with WordPress where wordpress replaces a + with a dash. All pointing to a lack of consistency across tagging. ABC categorises these stories under the following”:

Every one of our stories includes metadata on things like subjects, locations, importance and genre.

abc_tagcloud2.jpg

Preliminary Notes on Web-hosted Cinema

Alejandro Adams, Preliminary Notes on Web-hosted Cinema, http://www.braintrustdv.com/essays/web-hosted.html

There is nothing unique about returning to early film theory in an attempt to delimit the creative uses of digital video technology. Comparing the infancy of the first manifestation of cinema with the infancy of its successor is as natural as it is profitable. Invoking, as I will, the elaborate investigations of early theorists such as Béla Balázs and Rudolf Arnheim is a way to clarify my own observations concerning digital cinema in general and Web-hosted cinema in particular.

I got his reference from AM’s blog who posted a few notes on the article.

wordcamp tags and categories

I attended Melbourne wordcamp and caught a couple of presentations. Christine Davis the producer of the ultimate tag warrior did a presentation titles ‘Tags, Categories, Taxonomies, Folksonomies, Oh My!’. Tags where a hot topic of discussion with James Farmer pointing out that wordpress had been slow to include tags as part of the WP CMS until very recently. A key point of discussion was the difference between categories and tags. Apparently, there is a plug-in that convert categories to tags and back the other way on the premise there is no difference. Christine mentioned machine tags introduced by Flickr. From wikipedia:

They comprise three parts, a namespace, a predicate and a value.

Another reference machinetags.org There is also a connection here she suggested with Microformats. Categories where seen as being hierarchal grouping posts of similarity in a group and are more structured, used for organising content. Tags on the other hand more free form used to “determine the way things differ”. A comment in the audience suggested categories are chapters and tags the index. Davis’ response to which to uses suggested using both. Yahoo provide sites/services that recommend what tags to use like zonetag for example.

cut up video interviews

On the ARTNODE site they used this simple method to provide the user access to a video interview in parts. Each part relating to the interview question. The answer link leads to the video excerpt on a separate page. An abstract is also provided with each interview which covers briefly their background and the premise of the interview. I note they also use quotes in text from the interviews as an introduction into each interview. The full video interview is also provided as a straight linear run of the entire interview.

These are screenshots of the set-up from the website. These screenshots are of the Alex Galloway interview which is one of six in a series with specialists critiquing digital art.

ivAValex.jpg

ivAValex2.jpg